Determinants of Competency Development in Physical Education: The Mediating Role of Motivation and Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2026.5.07Keywords:
engagement, feedback, motivation, physical education, self-efficacy, serial mediation, teacher trainingAbstract
Objectives. This study tested a serial mediation model examining how pedagogical feedback and prior sport experience are associated with the development of perceived competencies in physical education (PE) through the sequential mediating roles of motivation and engagement.
Materials and Methods. Participants were 248 undergraduate students (Year 1: n = 91; Year 2: n = 92; Year 3: n = 65; 125 males, 123 females) enrolled in a Bachelor’s degree program in Physical Education and Sport at the École Normale Supérieure of Martil, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Morocco. Data were collected via an online, cross-sectional questionnaire comprising five eight-item Likert scales measuring motivation, perceived pedagogical feedback, engagement, prior sport experience, and perceived competency development, all self-reported by participants. Internal consistency was excellent for all scales (Cronbach’s α > .91). Two serial mediation models were tested using bootstrap resampling (5,000 iterations, 95% percentile confidence intervals).
Results. Both perceived pedagogical feedback and prior sport experience were significantly associated with perceived competency development. These relationships were partially accounted for by motivation and engagement (67% and 47% of the total association, respectively). Engagement emerged as the mediator most strongly associated with perceived competency development in both models. Notably, the indirect association through motivation alone was not significant for prior sport experience. No substantial differences were found across academic years, whereas prior competition participation correlated significantly with all five self-reported constructs. Given the cross-sectional, self-report design, these associations should not be interpreted causally.
Conclusions. Motivation and engagement operate as sequential, partially distinct mediators of the association between pedagogical feedback, prior sport experience, and perceived competency development. These findings offer important theoretical and practical implications for physical education teacher training, particularly regarding feedback design and differentiated support based on students’ competitive backgrounds.
Downloads
References
Mellado-Berenguer, J., & Monfort-Pañego, M. (2026). Analysing the physical education teaching competencies of pre-service teachers through observation. European Physical Education Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x261446607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X261446607
Salin, K., Huhtiniemi, M., Watt, A., Sääkslahti, A., & Jaakkola, T. (2026). The role of teaching experience and year level in shaping pre-service PE teachers' efficacy. European Physical Education Review, 32(2), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x251348397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X251348397
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Vallerand, R.J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Zhou, Y., Shao, W.D., & Wang, L. (2021). Effects of feedback on students' motor skill learning in physical education: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126281
Tian, L., & Shen, J. (2023). The effect of perceived teachers' interpersonal behavior on students' learning in physical education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1233556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233556
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Wong, Z.Y., & Liem, G.A.D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Egele, V.S., Klopp, E., & Stark, R. (2025). An empirical ranking of the importance of the sources of self-efficacy for physical activity. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 13(1), 2567322. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2025.2567322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2025.2567322
Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model. Human Development, 21(1), 34–64. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000271574
Moumen, A., & Koutaya, A. (2026). L'enseignement de l'EPS comme levier de motivation sportive chez les élèves du Programme Sport-Études au Maroc : une revue narrative exploratoire. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 7(8), 604–626. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21207684
Mousmi, N. (2026). Analyse du travail des étudiants de l'éducation physique et sportive au cours du module de la sensibilisation professionnelle. African Scientific Journal, 3(34), 610–633. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18620821
Fraj, H., Desbiens, J.-F., & Bali, N. (2023). Implantation du modèle LMD en Afrique : la mise en œuvre du nouveau curriculum de formation à l'enseignement de l'ÉPS dans les ISSEP tunisiens. eJRIEPS, 53, 96–132. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejrieps.8675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejrieps.8675
Tannoubi, A., Quansah, F., Hagan, J.E., Jr., Srem-Sai, M., Bonsaksen, T., Chalghaf, N., Boussayala, G., Azaiez, C., Snani, H., & Azaiez, F. (2023). Adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the University Student Engagement Inventory (A-USEI) among sport and physical education students. Psych, 5(2), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5020022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5020022
Guo, Q., Samsudin, S., Yang, X., Gao, J., Ramlan, M.A., Abdullah, B., & Farizan, N.H. (2023). Relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in physical education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(7), 6039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076039
Guo, Q., Wang, X., Gao, Z., Gao, J., Lin, X., & Samsudin, S. (2025). The influence of teacher support on student engagement in physical education among college students: The mediating effects of autonomous motivation and self-efficacy. PLOS ONE, 20(9), e0331876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331876
Xu, X., Tan, Y., & Abdullah, B. (2025). Unpacking how teacher support enhances learning engagement in physical education: A serial mediation model of academic self-efficacy and task orientation among Chinese college students. PLOS ONE, 20(10), e0333813. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333813
Hayes, A.F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Boateng, G.O., Neilands, T.B., Frongillo, E.A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H.R., & Young, S.L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Taber, K.S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158497
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Teh, W.L., Abdin, E., Asharani, P.V., Devi Siva Kumar, F., Roystonn, K., Wang, P., Shafie, S., Chang, S., Jeyagurunathan, A., Vaingankar, J.A., Sum, C.F., Lee, E.S., van Dam, R.M., & Subramaniam, M. (2023). Measuring social desirability bias in a multi-ethnic cohort sample: Its relationship with self-reported physical activity, dietary habits, and factor structure. BMC Public Health, 23, 415. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15309-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15309-3
Cheon, S.H., Reeve, J., & Moon, I.S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34(3), 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.3.365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.3.365
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hatim Ben Seddik, Hiba Rimy, Samir Essafi, Achraf Fikri, Badreddine Labakoum, Chaimae Khali, Soulaiman Harfouf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
