Potential of New Technologies in Providing Efficiency of Pedagogical Control in Physical Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.1.04

Keywords:

control, testing, monitoring, speed and power abilities, sensor device

Abstract

The study objective is to substantiate and implement modern electronic automated monitoring systems to improve the testing of speed-strength abilities in the process of physical education.

Materials and methods. To solve the research tasks used the methods of comparing and contrasting are used and analysis, synthesis, abstraction, formalization and technical modeling.

Results. The developed capacitive sensor device for control of speed-power abilities is presented. The device is built on a combination of modern nanotechnology and microprocessor systems. As part of the device, the array of active electrodes with digital output registers an input signal from a marker placed on the monitoring object and whose position changes during the exercise. Then the digital signal through the interface and the communication line, goes to the signal converter, where it is processed and wireless transmission devices signal goes to the personal computer, where the result of the exercise is displayed.

Conclusions. Use in pedagogical control of the physical education process of the developed device provides reliable objective test data with little loss of time to ensure the quality of control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Victor Koryahin, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Department of Physical Education
Bandera St, 12, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine
koryahinv@meta.ua

Oksana Blavt, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Department of Physical Education
Bandera St, 12, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine
oksanablavt@ukr.net

Oleksandra Vanivska, Ukrainian National Forestry University

General Chuprynky St, 103, Lviv, 79057, Ukraine
vanivskaoleksandra@gmail.com

Volodymyr Stadnyk, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Department of Physical Education
Bandera St, 12, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine
vova121212131313@ukr.net

References

Aadahl, M. & Jorgensen, T. (2003). Validation of a new self-report instrument for measuring physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35, 1196-1202. https://doi.org/10.1249 /01.MSS.0000074446.02192.14

Anikieiev, D.M. (2015). Criteria of effectiveness of students’ physical education system in higher educational establishments. Physical education of students, 5, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2015.0501

Alfrey, L., & Gard, M. (2014). A crack where the light gets in: a study of Health and Physical Education teachers’ perspectives on fitness testing as a context for learning about health. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 5(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2014.867790

Alme, K.J., & Mylvaganam, S. (2006). Electrical Capacitance Tomography: Sensor Models, Design, Simulations, and Experimental Verification IEEE. Sensors Journal, 6(5), 1256-1266. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2006.881409

Bassett, D.R. (2000). Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2000.11082783

Baxter, L.K. (1997). Capacitie sensors: design and application. IEEE Press.

Bracke, W., Puers, R., & Van Hoof, С. (2007). Ultra low power capacitive sensor interfaces. Springer.

Clarys, J.P., & Cabri, J. (1993). Electromyography and the study of sports movements: A review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 11(5), 379-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419308730010

Capobianco, R.A., Almuklass, A.M. & Enoka, R.M. (2018). Manipulation of sensory input can improve stretching outcomes. European Journal of Sport Science, 18(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2017.1394370

Chow, G.C.C., Chung, J.W.Y., Ma A.W.W, Macfarlane, D.J., & Shirley, S.M.F. (2017). Sensory organisation and reactive balance control of amateur rugby players: A cross-sectional study. European Journal of Sport Science, 17(4), 400-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1257656

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2015). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New-York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Geoffrey, A., Power, G., Handrigan, А., Basset, F.A. (2012). Ventilatory response during an incremental exercise test: A mode of testing effect. Pedagogy, 12(6), 491-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2011.573580

Edwards, W.H. (2010). Motor Learning and Control From Theory to Practice. California: Wadsworth.

Estivalet, M., & Springer, Р. (2009). The Engineering of Sport. Paris: Springer-Verlag.

Jrgensen, Т., Andersen, L.B., Froberg, К., Maeder, U.L., von Huth Smith, & Aadahl, М. (2009). Position statement: Testing physical condition in a population – how good are the methods? European Journal of Sport Science, 9(5), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390902862664

Haake, S. (1996). The engineering of sport. Taylor & Francis.

Hardman, K, & Green, K. (2011). Contemporari issues in phisical education. Mayer & Mayer Verlag.

Hotra, Z., Mykytyuk, Z, & Sushynskyy, O. (2010) Sensor systems with optical channel of information transferring. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, 86(10), 21-23. https://doi.org/bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BPOM-0032-0006

Ivashchenko, O.V. (2016). Pedagogical control of motor and functional fitness of girls 15-16 years. Teoria ta Metodika Fizičnogo Vihovanna, (3), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2016.3.1171. (in Ukrainian).

Ivashchenko, O., & Khudolii, O. (2016). Methodological approaches to pedagogical control in the process of physical education of girls 12-14 years old. Teoria ta Metodika Fizičnogo Vihovanna, (4), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2016.4.1175. (in Ukrainian).

Kavanagh, J.J., & Menz, H.B. (2008). Accelerometry: A technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. Gait & Posture, 28(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.010

Koryagin, V., & Blavt, O. (2019). Innovative test control technologies in physical education and sports: a monograph. Lviv, Ukraine: Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House, 236.

Koryahin, V., & Blavt, O. (2018). The Use of Information and Communication Technology for Determining the Level Mobility in Joint in Physical Education of Students. Teoria ta Metodika Fizičnogo Vihovanna, 18(3), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2018.3.01

Koryahin, V., Blavt, O., & Ponomaryov, S. (2019). Innovative Intestification of Testing of Strength Endurance in Physical Education of Students With Chronic Diseases. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 19(3), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2019.3.02

Koryahin, V., Mukan, N., Blavt, О., & Virt, V. (2019). Students’ coordination skills testing in physical education: ICT application. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 70(2), 216-226. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v70i2

Lauber, B., & Keller, M. (2014). Improving motor performance: Selected aspects of augmented feedback in exercise and health. European Journal of Sport Science, 14(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2012.725104

Magill, R.A. (2007). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill International Edition.

Matiegka, J. (1991). The testing of physical efficiency. Amer. Journal of Physical Anthropology, 4(3), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330040302

Mero, A., Komi, P.V., & Gregor, R.J. (1992). Biomechanics of sprint running. Sports Medicine, 13(6), 376-392.

Neville, J., Wixted, A., Rowlands, D., & James, D.(2010). Accelerometers: An underutilized resource in sports monitoring. Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), Brisbane, Australia, 287-290.

Nashner, L.M. (1997). Computerized dynamic posturography. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Yearbook.

Reiman, M.P., & Manske, R.C. (2009). Functional testing in human performance. Champaign IL : Human Kinetics.

Physiological testing of high-class athlete / ed. J. D. Mac-Duggala [et al.]. (1997). Kiev: Olympic literature. (in Russia).

Preatoni, Е., Hamill, J., Harrison, A.J., Hayes, К., Van Emmerik, R., Wilson, С. & Rodano, R. (2013). Movementvariability and skills monitoring in sports. Sports Biomechanics, 12(2), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2012.738700

Purcell, B., Channells, J., James, D., & Barrett, R. (2005). Use of accelerometers for detecting foot-ground contact time during running. Proceedings of SPIE, 6036(603615), 1-8.

Schmidt, R.A., & Wrisberg, C.A. (2008). Motor Learning and Performance: A Situation-based Learning Approach. (I. Champaign, Ed.). Human Kinetics.

Silverman, S., Keating, X.D., Phillips, S.R. (2008). A lasting impression: A pedagogical perspective on youth fitness testing. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 12,146-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10913670802216122

Shepard, N.T., & Janky, K. (2008). Background and technique of computerized dynamic posturography. San Diego, CA: Plural.

Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M.H. (2007). Normal postural control. Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

Stroot, S.A. (2014). Case Studies in Physical Education: Real World Preparation for Teaching. Routledge.

Stetter, B.J., Buckeridge, Е., Nigg, S.R., Sell, S. & Stein, T. (2019). Towards a wearable monitoring tool for in-field ice hockey skating performance analysis. European Journal of Sport Science, 19(7), 893-901. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1563634

Strohrmann, C., Harms, H., Kappeler-Setz, C., & Troster, G. (2012). Monitoring kinematic changes with fatigue in running using body-worn sensors. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 16(5), 983-990. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2012.2201950

Tanner, R., & Gore, С. (2012). Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes Second. Edition Human Kinetics, Inc.; Second edition.
Wulf, G. & Lewthwaite, R. (2009). Conceptions of Ability Affect Motor Learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41(5), 461-467. https://doi.org/10.3200/35-08-083

Downloads

Published

2020-03-25

How to Cite

Koryahin, V., Blavt, O., Vanivska, O., & Stadnyk, V. (2020). Potential of New Technologies in Providing Efficiency of Pedagogical Control in Physical Education. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 20(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.1.04

Issue

Section

Physical Training at School

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>